A few people have come to believe that OBCI is an ebola play because it now owns a disinfectant called performacide -- which it purchased 2 weeks ago for a mere $150,000.
I previously shorted this stock successfully from 5.30 to 3.95. I was very pleased to see it bounces again on low volume, which allowed me to take another shot at it. I was able to get a tranche filled of my short @ 4.47. I had orders to short more, which did not get filled as this stock couldn't get a bit higher.
A weekly chart really demonstrates how extraordinary this recent "ebola" move has been in relation to obci's trading history.
This has set up nice for a pop and drop rather than an "EP":
- Sustainability of New Demand, revenue and earnings?
Stocks like LAKE and APT have products that fill a demand that is currently unfilled. There will be a shortage of hazmat suits, etc.. . Yet every hospital, restaurant, airport, and most homes already have products that are more than capable of killing Ebola. All you need is a commercial grade disinfectant there are hundreds of products that fill that need. But don't take my word for it, per the CDC:
"Ebola is killed with hospital-grade disinfectants (such as household bleach)"
Heck, just in my basement, I already own at least 3 cleaners which I've owned for years that could kill Ebola:
- OdoBan® is an EPA registered disinfectant. The EPA Registration No. is 66243-2.
- OdoBan® meets AOAC efficacy standards for hospital disinfectants.
- OdoBan® meets AOAC efficacy standards for non-food contact surface sanitizers on hard non-porous surfaces.
- OdoBan® is a Hospital Disinfectant Cleaner that is effective against a wide variety of Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria. It is also an excellent deodorant and leaves a clean fresh odor. Respiratory illnesses attributable to Pandemic 2009 H1N1 are caused by influenza A virus. OdoBan® is a broad-spectrum hard surface disinfectant that has been shown to be effective against Influenza A/Hong Kong and is expected to inactivate all influenza A viruses including Pandemic 2009 H1N1 (formerly called swine flu). OdoBan® has demonstrated effectiveness against Influenza A/Hong Kong and is expected to inactivate all influenza A viruses including Pandemic 2009 H1N1 (formerly called swine flu)
Simple Green D (my wife likes organic shit) but again it would serve the same purpose
- Hospital–grade disinfectant
- One–step cleaner and deodorizer
- Fresh herbal–pine scent
- High dilution ratios for great economy
Ideal for airplanes, airports, athletic facilities, cafeterias, clinics, day care centers, emergency vehicles, exercise facilities, food service facilities, hospitals, hotels and motels, kitchens, locker rooms, nursing homes, prisons and correctional facilities, public restrooms, schools and colleges, anywhere cleanliness and disinfection are necessary.
Clorox Bleach. Perhaps most significant regular, ordinary bleach will kill ebola. No body needs to turn to some cleaner they've never heard off out of fear, They can go to the products they already buy such as Clorox Bleach, which is more than capable of killing ebola.
In fact, the company has already donated 12,000 bottles of Bleach to fight ebola:
"This week our company took a first step, donating 12,000 64-ounce bottles of Clorox® bleach destined for West Africa. "
Incidentally, Clorox's initial donation has a market value of nearly the entirety of OBCI's purchase of performacide.
Consequently, I would question whether there will be any uptick in profits at all. Any revenue OBCI receives would be mere fraction of the purchase price it paid for Performacide. Obviously, if performacide were generating 150K in profits a year, it would have sold for a multiple of its earnings (P/e ratio).
- But isn't Performacide the best, Ebola killer out there?
"Solution will be usable in 60 minutes (1 hour).So we have an Ebola outbreak and I have to choose how to clean it up. Do I go with the product such as bleach that can be used immediately or do I pick Performacide which I have to wait an hour to use?
NOTE: Allow ONE (1) HOUR BEFORE USE TO ENSURE SOLUTION REACHES FULL STRENGTH. Be sure to agitate upon addition of the pouch to the water and before initial use. Temperature must be kept between 20-25oC. "
- Soft goods, such as linens, clothes, etc..? nope: Performacide is a "DISINFECTANT OR VIRUCIDE* FOR HARD, NON-POROUS SURFACES?
- Buyout potential
I've seen bulls now make the claim that this is a "buy out candidate" because it has tight insider ownership. I can't tell you how many times, I've heard such claims by bulls (usually with losing positions that are holding out hope of getting even) that xyz is a buyout candidate. Anyway, here is why that will not happen.
Entities that buy companies are typically not stupid. They are not going to pay an "Ebola" premium for a company such as OBCI that has not demonstrated any revenue acceleration, but has shown stagnate revenue growth over the past few years:
Another reason I do not see a buyout is that the company insiders rely heavily inn the company for income. In addition to their salaries there are a number of "Related Party Transactions" that app are to make more for the insiders than their OBCI day jobs:
- During the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company sold products to companies affiliated with its Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer. The affiliated companies distribute the products outside of the United States and Canada.
- Sales to the affiliated companies aggregated approximately $295,000 and $469,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and approximately $1,008,000 and $940,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
- This begs the question why is the CEO's personal companies distributing OBCI's products instead of OBCI?
- "the terms of sale to the affiliated companies differed from the terms applicable to other customers ..." OBCI then goes on to attempt to justify the sweet heart deal the CEO's affiliate company is getting "the affiliated companies bear their own warehousing, distribution, advertising, selling and marketing costs, as well as their own freight charges"
- "A subsidiary of the Company currently uses the services of an entity that is owned by its Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer to conduct product research and development, marketing and advertising. .. the Company paid the entity approximately $10,500 for each of the three month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, and $21,000 for each of the six month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013."
- The Company leases office and warehouse facilities in Fort Lauderdale, Florida from an entity controlled by its Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer.
- A director of the Company is Regional Executive Vice President of an entity from which the Company sources most of its insurance needs at an arm’s length competitive basis. During the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company paid an aggregate of approximately $98,000 and $150,000, respectively, and during the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company paid an aggregate of approximately $315,000 and $333,000, respectively, in insurance premiums on policies obtained through the entity.
These types of transaction should always raise red flags. Frankly, If I were a shareholder I would question the property of such transactions. If these deals are worth doing, why isn't management doing them for the company instead of for themselves. Got fiduciary duty? Well at least we know that management would be insured against such a claim from the policies they purchased from their director's company.
I've worked with numerous private equity groups. There is no way that investors are going to buyout a company that has all these additional contracts to benefit management's own companies. I would also suspect that management has no interest in selling given the deals their own companies are making off the backs of the OBCI shareholders.
Q2 results that saw EPS growth of 137% doesn't that demonstrate huge growth? not so much turns out. --- Consider Q1 Revs. Down pretty big.
So what happened? Well it turns out that Q1 was pretty cold in most parts of the country and customers delayed their purchases that they would have made in Q1 to Q2-- so Q1 looked horrible and Q2 looked amazing. Combine q1 and q2 them Q13 had 14.49 mill versus 14.72 mill in revs for Q1. Not exactly setting the world on fire with that type of growth.
- Stock price has increased purely on Ebola hype
- OBCI is unlikely to ever realize any revenues due to that hype
- A buyout is a pipe dream of desperate longs.
- Current earnings and rev growth do not support the stock price pop
- Price target-- Back to business as usual. $2.95-3.25